Today I attended the Bethnal Green and Bow husting held at Christ Church Spitalfields.

Firstly, I was disappointed that the candidates from Respect, Conservatives and BNP didn’t bother to turn up. The Respect are the incumbent party in the constituency – however attendance and participation is not one of their strong points. Zakir Khan had sent along someone else to stand in for him.

Here are my notes on the debate:

  • Labour Rushanara Ali
    • Was the most attacked candidate (probably because Respect wasn’t in attendance).
    • Got a good feeling for her background and experience – which she clearly has lots of. Also very articulate and straight talking.
    • Her ending sound bite was a plead to not protest vote Labour in this seat as the margin is so slim. The risk is another year of Respect.
    • 7/10
  • Green Farid Bakht
    • I was surprised by this candidate. He’s articulate and switched on.
    • Gave a very good response to a challenge about Green credentials from van Terheyden.
    • From his final sound bite – he’s clearly not expecting to win however encouraged a protest vote to send a message.
    • 7/10
  • United Voice Hasib Hikmat
    • Scary! Zero tolerance policing, same sex schools, anti-gay according to his education policies.
    • Effectively became the pseudo-BNP for the night.
    • 2/10
  • Liberal Democrat Ajmal Masroor
    • A good orator but quite populist too.
    • Basically echoed the standard Lib Dem policies to date.
    • I just feel he’s too popular (and sometimes comical!) and not a true statesman.
    • 6/10
  • Pirate Alexander van Terheyden
    • Aside from Pirate’s policies on copyright and surveillance reform, I didn’t pick up much in terms of policy from Alex.
    • Mostly talked to the gallery on populist issues and baited other candidates.
    • Didn’t really talk about what he’d do in office except keep Brick Lane police station open 24/7.
    • 4/10

Questions were submitted 30 mins before a one-hour panel discussion. I felt that this limited participation and it wasn’t clear how questions were selected. I wished that I’d contacted the organisers a few weeks ago and suggested that we use something like Google Moderator. The debates were very well managed  though – full credit to the chairman for his firm control of candidates.